Reid Jackson
Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Adjudicator Past Decisions
Overview
460
460
83
25
Order OutcomesPRO
Eviction Relief Granted to Tenant 83 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Reid Jackson's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Reid Jackson typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Lanlord's Notice Found Invalid 25 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Reid Jackson's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Reid Jackson typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Contested Dispute by CategoryPRO
- Tenant Agreed Termination26
Landlord Win Rate: 50%
- Tenant Rights26
Landlord Win Rate: 42.31%
- Personal Use23
Landlord Win Rate: 13.04%
- Harassment16
Landlord Win Rate: 25%
- Bad Faith Eviction15
Landlord Win Rate: 33.33%
- Breach Of Conditions11
Landlord Win Rate: 36.36%
Unlock Full Access to Reid Jackson's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Reid Jackson typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Orders
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for personal use was dismissed due to lack of evidence supporting a genuine intention to occupy the unit.
The Landlord was found to have served a notice of termination in bad faith and was ordered to pay $8,448.00 in compensation to the Tenants.
METCAP LIVING MANAGEMENT INC. v Hammad
The Landlord's application for eviction due to non-payment of rent was discontinued after the Tenant paid the full arrears.
Robert v O******** Harvest Sharing
The Tenant's application for bad faith eviction was dismissed as the Landlord proved the unit was converted to non-residential use.
Parker and Wright v Santhaneswaran
A Tenant's application for bad faith eviction was dismissed because the Landlord demonstrated that the intended occupant was unable to move in due to legitimate health complications.
Hazelview Properties Services Inc v C****** Dominguez
The Landlord's application for non-payment of rent was dismissed because the Landlord did not attend the scheduled hearing.
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for personal use was dismissed due to lack of evidence supporting a genuine intention to occupy the unit.
The Landlord was found to have served a notice of termination in bad faith and was ordered to pay $8,448.00 in compensation to the Tenants.
METCAP LIVING MANAGEMENT INC. v Hammad
The Landlord's application for eviction due to non-payment of rent was discontinued after the Tenant paid the full arrears.
Robert v O******** Harvest Sharing
The Tenant's application for bad faith eviction was dismissed as the Landlord proved the unit was converted to non-residential use.
Parker and Wright v Santhaneswaran
A Tenant's application for bad faith eviction was dismissed because the Landlord demonstrated that the intended occupant was unable to move in due to legitimate health complications.
Hazelview Properties Services Inc v C****** Dominguez
The Landlord's application for non-payment of rent was dismissed because the Landlord did not attend the scheduled hearing.
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for personal use was dismissed due to lack of evidence supporting a genuine intention to occupy the unit.
The Landlord was found to have served a notice of termination in bad faith and was ordered to pay $8,448.00 in compensation to the Tenants.
METCAP LIVING MANAGEMENT INC. v Hammad
The Landlord's application for eviction due to non-payment of rent was discontinued after the Tenant paid the full arrears.
Robert v O******** Harvest Sharing
The Tenant's application for bad faith eviction was dismissed as the Landlord proved the unit was converted to non-residential use.
Parker and Wright v Santhaneswaran
A Tenant's application for bad faith eviction was dismissed because the Landlord demonstrated that the intended occupant was unable to move in due to legitimate health complications.
Hazelview Properties Services Inc v C****** Dominguez
The Landlord's application for non-payment of rent was dismissed because the Landlord did not attend the scheduled hearing.
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for personal use was dismissed due to lack of evidence supporting a genuine intention to occupy the unit.
The Landlord was found to have served a notice of termination in bad faith and was ordered to pay $8,448.00 in compensation to the Tenants.
METCAP LIVING MANAGEMENT INC. v Hammad
The Landlord's application for eviction due to non-payment of rent was discontinued after the Tenant paid the full arrears.
Robert v O******** Harvest Sharing
The Tenant's application for bad faith eviction was dismissed as the Landlord proved the unit was converted to non-residential use.
Parker and Wright v Santhaneswaran
A Tenant's application for bad faith eviction was dismissed because the Landlord demonstrated that the intended occupant was unable to move in due to legitimate health complications.
Hazelview Properties Services Inc v C****** Dominguez
The Landlord's application for non-payment of rent was dismissed because the Landlord did not attend the scheduled hearing.
Unlock Full Access to Reid Jackson's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Reid Jackson typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
Tenant Harassment and Illegal Entry: Understanding Your Rights and Remedies Under Ontario Law
A comprehensive guide to tenant rights regarding harassment and illegal entry in Ontario, exploring what constitutes violations, how the LTB evaluates these claims, and the remedies available to protect tenants from landlord misconduct.
The Appeal Process Decoded: When and How to Challenge LTB Decisions at the Divisional Court
Navigate the complex world of appealing Landlord and Tenant Board decisions to Ontario's Divisional Court. Learn the strict requirements, common pitfalls, and strategies for successful appeals.
How to Fill Out the L2 Application: Ontario Landlord's Guide to Ending a Tenancy and Evicting a Tenant
Complete guide to the LTB L2 application for landlords seeking eviction after N5, N6, N7, N8, N12, or N13 notices. Covers filing deadlines, money claims, N12/N13 disclosures, and common errors.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform